Washington Crossing the Delaware, Emanuel Leutze, 1851 The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Public Domain,
My American
friends will have to excuse this Brit for writing about what is possibly the
most famous of American paintings. Emanuel Leutze, 1816 – 1868, was a
German-American ‘History Painter’; History painting was at the summit of the hierarchy
of genres, meaning that it was considered the most important because, to paraphrase
Samuel Johnson, it required all of the skills that were needed for all other
types of painting. This painting was completed
in 1851, around the time that those
hierarchies were starting to become less important. In keeping with the genre, it is of a
monumental size, measuring more than 12ft by 21ft., (3.78 by 6.47m). He started
to paint the picture in 1849 but it was damaged by a fire in his studio in
1850. It was restored only to be destroyed in Berlin in 1942 by a bombing raid.
He did, however, make at least two copies and many other artists have copied
and pastiched this painting.
I think it
is a very beautiful picture which has been executed with great skill. There are
various inaccuracies and ‘impossibilities’ of which it may seem petty of me to
mention. However, it won’t stop me because they are all interesting points.
Firstly, the man standing on Washington’s right (who is James Munroe, a future
President), is holding the Stars and Stripes flag which did not exist as such until
well after this depiction – on the dawning of 26th December 1776.
The Delaware is much narrower than depicted here at that crossing point and
when it freezes over it tend to be in sheets, not chunks as depicted. The
artist used images of the Rhine to create the river, where the ice does form chunks. Incidentally,
Washington was leading a surprise attack on the Hessian troops based in
Trenton, New Jersey, who were German mercenaries employed by the British; they
formed fully 30% of British troops in the War of Independence!
The boats,
shown carrying a selection of ‘types’, eg. a Scotsman, a Negro, a Frontiersman
etc, are of the wrong kind with sides that are much too low. The light is all
wrong, appearing to come from several different directions at once. Also, Washington,
reasonably enough, is shown in an heroic pose but would not have been able to
stand up like that. None of this matters much- it is a magnificent piece of
work which creates real depth by the way in which the background boats are
spread into the distance and one can almost reach out to touch the ice-chunks.
I'm listening to Carole King singing her own song, "I Wasn't Born to Follow" made famous by The Byrds but I love her version best! |
"Many years later, as he faced the firing squad, Colonel Aureliano Buendia was to remember that distant afternoon when his father took him to discover ice."
Gabriel Garcia Marquez: "One Hundred Years of Solitude"
View my previous blog here: http://bazzablog-uk.blogspot.com
I reply to all comments except spam, no matter how old!
Please ignore any email address displayed here! My email is shamp123 AT sky.com
Tuesday, 9 August 2016
Painting of the Month (64) August 2016: Leutze
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
Hi Bazza - it's a huge piece of art ... then it's been through some life. It's fascinating to read the 'inaccuracies' - as it allows us to interpret the painting more thoroughly ... I'll be back - as I need to check the history ... and to read your post with the art work displayed. Thanks for this - cheers Hilary
Hello Hilary. You must be the most pro-active reader I have! Thanks for your interest - it keeps me on my toes.....
>>..."There are various inaccuracies and ‘impossibilities’ of which it may seem petty of me to mention. However, it won’t stop me because they are all interesting points"
You are so right - how funny!
Thanks Dixie. No offence meant! It's good to hear from you.
Hi Bazza - I know so little about the American Civil War ... but collect snippets which feed into my minimal knowledge base - and I love how so many liberties were taken when paintings were created (painted) ... and I guess the internet wasn't around for them to check up their historical facts!* It's 'frightening' how little history I know about the Americas ... but thanks for this and for introducing us to Leutze.
After writing the early part of this comment ... the 2nd para refutes to a point what I said above ...
I found that connection really interesting ... and the fact (apparently) that Leutze painted this work to inspire the Revolutions in Europe of 1848 ... the map-image showing 'the muddle' of European states is fascinating ... I'll have to be back at some stage to look into the history further. It always surprises me that Germany, as Germany, only came about in 1871 ...
History is extraordinary ... I'm reading Patrick Leigh Fermor's books ... about his walking to Istanbul from London down the Rhine and the Danube (in 1933) ... he is such a knowledgeable man ... that he makes the history attainable ... loving them.
Cheers - I think that's me done here for now ... Hilary
Thank you Hilary. I think any artist would claim that what their work has to be, first and foremost, is a work of art despite any 'purpose' behind it. It's same with 'the film of the book'; it's first duty is NOT to be faithful to the book but, instead to be a good film. (That's why so many people are disappointed if they read the book first!)
One might say that presenting facts that are not strictly true is the first step on the road to abstraction, where nothing concrete is being represented. Look for my upcoming Painting of the Month for September - Bridget Riley.
I have always liked this painting. I enjoyed your commentary on it. Yes, it is a romanticized version of what really happened, but still a masterpiece!
I have seen the picture and heard about some of these inaccuracies. It is beautiful and very inspiring, but like so much about politics, it fibs.
I thought of you last week when I took my two teenage granddaughters to The Brandywine River Museum in ChaddsFord . They are both aspiring artists and I wanted to introduce them to three of our famous painters/illustrators, NC, Andrew, and Jamie Wyeth. They liked the museum but we're even more interested in seeing their homes and studios. I think I remember you saying that you had been there and I was surprised that someone from across the sea had visited our little towns. I do think, though, that Chester County is a lovely place and has some nice places to tour ( Longwood a Gardens and some very nice vineyards).
Hey bazza,
Okay, my fine chap, you wait for my eagerly anticipated comment is over! You have a variety of comments. Some from Brits and some from Americans. Must check to see if they have been spelling in correct English, as in English, English.
Okay, I strayed from the topic. I've always been fascinated by that painting. Inaccuracies galore but what the hell. Thanks for your insightful take on it, good sir.
Gary
I'd forgotten that Leutze's original had been destroyed. I've seen the painting in the Met and it is indeed impressive.
SHERRY: I like romanticised versions of history! We never learn the real truth anyway.
ARLEEN, Starting Over: You're right to recognise it as 'politics' and as a 'fib'. The winners (ie governments) write history. As Churchill once said "History will be kind to me, for I shall write it"!
GARY aka GAZZA/:It's always interesting how spellings differ on different sides of the Atlantic. Maybe it's time for another post on that subject (three so far!). Always good to hear from you.
DEBORAH: I've never seen it Deborah, but I think it would be hard to ignore at that massive size!
Post a Comment